Al Wakeelo
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Petitioner: JAMSHEED ANSARI VS Respondent: THE STATE
Court Name: Sindh High Court Judge(s): Abdul Hayee Qureshi Title: JAMSHEED ANSARI vs THE STATE Case No.: Criminal Bail Applications Nos. 1044 and 1052 of 1984 Date of Judgment:1984-11-03 Reported As: 1985 P Cr. L J 1251 Result: Interim bail accepted
Judgment ORDER ' I propose to deal with Criminal Bail Applications Nos. 1044/1984 and 1052/1984 by this single order as these two applications arise out of the same incident and the same case. The learned Additional Advocate-General has no objection to the confirmation of the interim order granting bail to the applicants. He states that no injuries are alleged to have been caused by these applicants and in fact there was a huge crowd of 40 persons and most of them absconding. It is also stated that most of the accused persons have been granted bail by the Sessions Judge, Karachi, but these applicants were refused bail because in their applications allegations against the police had not been made. The learned Advocates, however, state that it shall be unjustified to keep the applicants in custody and police wants to arrest them with the purpose of maltreating them. ' Interim bail is confirmed. ' Interim .