Al Wakeelo
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Petitioner: ZAMAN SHAH VS Respondent: SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ATTOCKHonorable Justice ABDUL HAMID KHAN
1992 P L C (C
1992 P L C (C.S.) 1047
[Service Tribunal Punjab]
Present: Muhammad Mehmud Aslam Pirzada, Chairman and Abdul Hamid Khan, Member
Syed ZAMAN SHAH
Versus
SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ATTOCK and another
Appeal No. 937/785 of 1987, decided on 7th April, 1990.
Civil service---
----Adverse remarks ---Civil servant, who was Sub-Inspector, C.I.A. Staff, was given a `C' report by Superintendent of Police in his Annual Confidential Report for the period he remained posted under him---Reporting officer also observed that civil servant was a lethargic officer who knew very little about his job---Civil servant had contended that higher officer under whom he served thereafter had given him `A' class report and that prior to period for which adverse remarks were given against him, he had worked very efficiently and was awarded commendation certificates for good work and cash award as well---Reporting Officer had given adverse remarks on basis of civil servant's actual performance during period of his posting under reporting officer for which reporting officer himself was a witness---Held, for purposes of evaluating performance of civil servant during that time span; for which his report was made his conduct or performance during periods preceding that period and one following it were not relevant---During period in question, civil servant admittedly having failed to show any efficiency in performance of his duty, orders of Authorities in respect of adverse remarks against civil servant, could not be interfered with.
Zia-ul-Hassan for Appellant.
A.G. Humayun, District Attorney for Respondents.
Date of hearing: 28th March, 1990.