Al Wakeelo
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Petitioner: KHURSHID ALI and 9 others VS Respondent: THE STATE
Court Name: Lahore High Court Judge(s): Sardar Muhammad Aslam Title: KHURSHID ALI and 9 others vs THE STATE Case No.: Criminal Miscellaneous No,6612/B of 2005 Date of Judgment:2005-09-27 Reported As: 2006 P Cr. L J 462 Result: Order accordingly
Judgment ORDER ' SARDAR MUHAMMAD ASLAM, J.--- The petitioners seek pre-arrest bail in case F.I.R. No,310, dated 10- 7-2005 registered under sections 379/386/337-H(2)/148/149, P,P.C. With- Police Station Sharaqpur District Sheikhupura on the grounds that the petitioners have falsely been involved in the instant case with mala fide intention of the complainant and the police in order to disgrace and humiliate them. 2. On the other hand, learned counsel for the complainant assisted by the State opposed the prayer for confirmation of pre-arrest bail. 3. Heard. Record perused. 4. According to the prosecution story narrated in the F.I.R., deadly weapons were used in the commission of offence. However, nobody received any injury in the incident. -Specific role has been assigned to Khurshid Ali, Shahid Ali and Hussain Haider, petitioners Nos.1, 3 and 9. They have failed to point out any material or mala fide with the complainant and the police to falsely involve them in the present case. Recovery of crime-weapons and property is yet to be made. They are thus, not entitled to concession of bail. Their petition is dismissed. 5. As far remaining petitioners, there is general allegation against them. It appears that they have not committed the offence alleged against them in my tentative assessment. Their petition is thus, allowed subject to furnishing bail bonds in the sum of Rs,50,000 each with one surety each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court.