Legal Principle & Question Decided

Ruling Summary: This decision was rendered by the Sindh High Court, officially reported as 2025 SHC 3204. In this matter between Const. P. 766/2025 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi - Muhammad Marjan (Petitioner) and the Respondent, the court adjudicated key questions of statutory construction, procedural regularity, and legal precedent under Pakistani law.

Core Holding: The honorable bench evaluated governing statutory provisions and judicial authorities to establish the rights of the parties, delivering the binding reasoning set out below.

Full Judgment Text & Judicial Ruling

COURT: Sindh High Court CASE NO: Const. P. 766/2025 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi CITATION: 2025 SHC KHI 3204 PARTIES: Muhammad Marjan (Petitioner) ORDER DATE: 08-SEP-25 BENCH: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) A.F.R: Yes ------------------------------------------------------------ [1]

ORDER SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH AT KARACHI

Constitutional Petition No. S-766 of 2022

Date Order with signature of Judge(s)

1. For order on office objection 2. For hearing of CMA No.5073/2022 (U/A 164 of the Qanun-e-Shahadat) 3. For hearing of main case

08.9.2025

Mr. Shuja Sahito advocate holds brief for Mr. Muhammad Bilal Rashid advocate for the petitioner Mr. Ali Safdar Depar, Assistant AG SI Elahi Bux, PS Gulshan-e-Iqbal, Karachi --------------------------------

Mr. Fahim Ahmed Abro advocate files Vakalatnama on behalf of respondent No.7, which is taken on record. Through the instant petition, the petitioner has sought the following relief:- “i) That this Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents No.1 and 2 to provide protection to petitioner and her family members.

ii) That this Court maybe pleased to direct the Respondents No.1 and 2 to remove the guards deployed at the residence of Petitioner.

iii) That this Court maybe pleased to direct the Respondent No.3 and 5 to follow the legal process and comply with the orders of Ex-Offico Justice of Peace, III-Additional Sessions Judge (East) dated 21.02.2022.

iv) That this Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent No.1 to restrain the Respondent No.6 from deploying armed guards at the residence of the Petitioner.

DIG Karachi East was directed to ensure that no law and order situation develops where the petitioner lives as her complaint was confined to the harassment at the hands of the guards of the private Security Company engaged by respond ent No.7 who had continuously been harassing her and those guards were allegedly supported by the local police, in such circumstances, DIG was also directed to ensure that no member of the police would be privy to the private affairs. In the event, the petitioner approached the Police Station with a complaint that she was being threatened, intimidated or harassed by the private guards, DIG would ensure that a competent neutral and honest officer could be deputed to look into the matter and that everyone should be dealt with in accordance with law. Today, counsel representing private respondent No.7 states that no harassment shall be caused to the petitioner at any cost. In view of such statement, this petition stands disposed of alongwith listed / pending a pplication(s) with directions to the police to ensure that the private security guards of respondent No.7 shall not cause any harassment to the petitioner in any manner of whatsoever nature.

JUDGE Zahid/*

Related Legal Research & Directories

• Browse all judgments from Sindh High Court
• Search Pakistani statutes: Constitution of Pakistan 1973, PPC, CrPC, CPC & Family Laws
• Analyze this case with Al Wakeelo AI Legal Assistant