Al Wakeelo
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Petitioner: SANAULLAH AND Others VS Respondent: KAMAL DIN
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pakistan Judge(s): Nasim Hasan Shah, Durab Patel Title: SANAULLAH AND Others vs KAMAL DIN Case No.: Civil Review Petition No. 11-R of 1978 Appeal No. 617 of 1978 Date of Judgment:1980-03-25 Reported As: 1981 SCMR 781 Result: Petition dismissed
Judgment ORDER DORAB PATEL, J.-The petitioner had filed a petition for leave against a judgment of the Lahore High Court dated 8th February, 1974, which came up for hearing before this Court on 18th February, 1978. As the learned counsel for the petitioner stated "that he does not wish to press the petition", the Court dismissed it with the observation : "accordingly it is dismissed as not pressed." The petitioners now seek a review of this order on .The ground that their learned counsel, Mr. Awan Mohammad Hanif Khan had been paid full fees and had withdrawn the petition without the petitioners' consent, and further that the petitioners raised an important question of law, and, therefore, merited admission. But, even if it is assumed that the petition for leave merited admission, the petition was dismissed as withdrawn, because of the statement made by the. Learned counsel for the petitioners. Therefore, the error, if any, is in the statement made by the petitioners' learned counsel and there is no error much less any error apparent in the order dismissing the petition for leave as withdrawn.