Al Wakeelo logo

Al Wakeelo

Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty

Initializing Secure Chambers

2009 YLR 2175

KHADIM HUSSAIN VS State

Petitioner: KHADIM HUSSAIN VS Respondent: StateHonorable Justice Syed Pir Ali ShahAmeer Ali Mahessar

Court: Sindh High Court

Full Judgment Text & Judicial Ruling

2009 Y L R 2175

2009 Y L R 2175

[Karachi]

Before Syed Pir Ali Shah, J

KHADIM HUSSAIN---Applicant

Versus

THE STATE---Respondent

Criminal Bail Application No.S-203 of 2008, decided on 27th June, 2008.

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)---

----S. 497---Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S.392---Bail, grant of---Delay of seven days in lodging F.I.R.---Accused was in jail for the last 16 months, but during said period of 16 months not a single witness had been examined by the Trial Court---Accused was entitled for bail and same could not be withheld as punishment---Accused was granted bail in circumstances.

Ameer Ali Mahessar for Applicant.

Mukhtiar Ahmed Khanzada for the State.

ORDER

SYED PIR ALI SHAH, J.--- This bail application has mainly been argued that there is un-explained inordinate delay in lodging of F.I.R. It is argued that complainant Muhammad Haroon and P.W. Faizan have sworn their affidavits exonerating the applicant from the commission of the offence. It is stated that there is no apprehension of tampering with the prosecution evidence, so also likelihood of absconding of the applicant. Copies of affidavits of complainant Muhammad Haroon and P.W. Faizan have been produced.

On the other hand, learned State counsel vehemently opposed to the grant of bail to accused Khadim Hussain, as according to him, seven days delay in lodging of F.I.R. has been explained and that complainant and P.W. Faizan have not been produced before this Court. He argued that specific role has been assigned to the applicant and, as such, in absence of any enmity with the complainant party, accused is not entitled for bail.

As per F.I.R., allegations against the present applicant are that on 16-2-2007 he along with three others stopped the complainant who was riding the motorcycle along with P.W. Faizan. It is mentioned that the face of one person was muffled and others were open faces and out of them, one muffled face person armed with pistol asked the complainant to get down from motorcycle due to resistance of the complainant, the face of muffled person was exposed and he was identified as Khadim Hussain Korai. Thereafter they robbed motorcycle and fled away. The matter was initially complained to the nek mards and afterwards it was reported to the police on 23-2-2007 at 2-30 p.m. The complainant and P.W. Faizan have sworn their affidavits before the trial Court and their filing of affidavits before this Court are not essentially required. Obviously, there is delay of seven days in lodging of F.I.R: The applicant was arrested on 25-2-2007 and, as such during past 16 months not a single witness has been examined by the trial Court. In these circumstances, applicant/accused is entitled for bail and his bail cannot be withheld as a sought of punishment, he is granted bail on furnishing surety in the sum of Rs. one hundred thousand and P.R. bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of learned trial Court.

H.B.T:/K-24/K Bail granted.

Related Legal Research & Directories