Legal Principle & Question Decided

Ruling Summary: This decision was rendered by the Sindh High Court, officially reported as 2024 SHC 171. In this matter between Cr.Rev 26/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur - Mujeeb Rehman & Another (Applicant) and the Respondent, the court adjudicated key questions of statutory construction, procedural regularity, and legal precedent under Pakistani law.

Core Holding: The honorable bench evaluated governing statutory provisions and judicial authorities to establish the rights of the parties, delivering the binding reasoning set out below.

Full Judgment Text & Judicial Ruling

COURT: Sindh High Court CASE NO: Cr.Rev 26/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur CITATION: 2024 SHC SUK 165 PARTIES: Mujeeb Rehman & Another (Applicant) ORDER DATE: 06-MAY-24 BENCH: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) A.F.R: Yes ------------------------------------------------------------ IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH BENCH AT SUKKUR Crl. Revision Appln. No.S–26 of 2024 (Mujeeb Rehman Narejo and another Vs. Mst. Reebul & others)

DATE OF HEARING

ORDER WITH SIGNATURE OF JUDGE.

1. For Orders on O/objection at flag-A. 2. For hearing of CMA No.1778/24. 3. For hearing of main case.

Date of hearing and Order 06.05.2024

None present for applicant. Mr. Aftab Ahmed Shar, Addl. Prosecutor General. Respondents Mst. Beebul and Aftab are present, in person. ******** O R D E R. Adnan-ul-Karim Memon J: - Respondent No. 2 Abdul Majeed claims to be detainee as per raid report submitted by the Magistrate; consequently, upon the intervention of learned Additional Sessions Jud ge/Justice of Peace Moro, who imposed costs of Rs. 100,000/ - upon the applicants payable to the private respondent No.2 Abdul Majeed vide order dated 28 -03-2024. The applicants being aggrieved by and dissatisfied with the order dated 28 -03-2024 filed this Crl. Revisions Application on the ground that the private respondent was arrested in Crime No. 88/2024 of PS Moro and prepared such mashirnama dated 12-03-2024. As per applicants, respondent No. 2 is a criminal type person and is involved in number of case s in District Naushahro Feroze; that impugned order is perverse, capricious and against the law; they prayed for allowing the instant Crl. Revision Application. It appears from the record that after filing this Crl. Revision Application the applicants succeeded to obtain interim order vide order dated 15-04-2024 and matter was posted today for hearing. Today they are called absent without intimation. In view of the above, this Court is left with no option but to recall the interim order dated 15 -04-2024. Resultantly this Crl. Revision Application is dismissed along with pending applications on account of non -prosecution as nobody is turning up and no intimation has been received.

J U D G E

Ihsan/*

Related Legal Research & Directories

• Browse all judgments from Sindh High Court
• Search Pakistani statutes: Constitution of Pakistan 1973, PPC, CrPC, CPC & Family Laws
• Analyze this case with Al Wakeelo AI Legal Assistant