Al Wakeelo
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Petitioner: RIAZ AHMAD VS Respondent: WAPDA.
1992 P L C (C
1992 P L C (C.S.) 1351
[Federal Service Tribunal]
Before Ch. Hasan Nawaz and Muhammad Ismail, Members
RIAZ AHMAD
Versus
WAPDA through Chairman, and 2 others
Appeal No. 249(I) of 1988, decided on 22nd March, 1992.
(a) Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973)---
----S. 4---Civil servant's claim of seniority against respondent---Civil servant's appeal did not show against which order he had filed appeal---Earlier order of promotion whereby respondent had been promoted while civil servant's case was to be considered after decision of disciplinary action against him, had been withdrawn retrospectively---Civil servant and respondent both were placed in Glade-16, whereby civil servant was shown senior to respondent; such order was not subject-matter of challenge in appeal---Civil servant did not say that he was aggrieved by such order and he had made no representation against that order---Appeal was directed against something which was not in existence and was thus, incompetent under S.4, Service Tribunals Act, 1973.
(b) Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973)---
----S.4---Appeal----Limitation---No final order having been passed, it was not possible to fix point of time, whence period of limitation could be deemed to have started running against civil servant---There being no cause of grievance and no final order having been passed, appeal was dismissed being incompetent.
Hamid Khan for Appellant
Ch. Ghulam Hasan Gulshan with Muhammad Ejaz, Legal Assistant for WAPDA.