Al Wakeelo logo

Al Wakeelo

Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty

Initializing Secure Chambers

Cr.Bail 1231/2025 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad - Imamuddin @ Deno (Applicant) — 2025 SHC 1231

Official Citation: 2025 SHC 1231

Court / Jurisdiction: Sindh High Court

Petitioner: Cr.Bail 1231/2025 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad - Imamuddin @ Deno (Applicant)

Legal Principle & Question Decided

Ruling Summary: This decision was rendered by the Sindh High Court, officially reported as 2025 SHC 1231. In this matter between Cr.Bail 1231/2025 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad - Imamuddin @ Deno (Applicant) and the Respondent, the court adjudicated key questions of statutory construction, procedural regularity, and legal precedent under Pakistani law.

Core Holding: The honorable bench evaluated governing statutory provisions and judicial authorities to establish the rights of the parties, delivering the binding reasoning set out below.

Full Judgment Text & Judicial Ruling

COURT: Sindh High Court CASE NO: Cr.Bail 1231/2025 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad CITATION: 2025 SHC HYD 3485 PARTIES: Imamuddin @ Deno (Applicant) ORDER DATE: 24-NOV-25 BENCH: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author) A.F.R: Yes ------------------------------------------------------------ IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH CIRCUIT COURT HYDERABAD

Criminal Bail Application No.S-1231 of 2025

Applicant : Imamudin @ Deno through Mr. Shahed Mirbahar, Advocate.

Complainant : Sher Dil in Person.

State : Through Mr . Altaf Hussain Khokhar, D.P.G.

Date of Hearing : 24.11 .2025

Date of Order : 24.11 .2025

O R D E R ARSHAD HUSSAIN KHAN, J :- Through the instant Cr. Bail application, the applicant/accused seeks pre-arrest bail in Crime No.20 of 2025 registered at Police Station Manjhand District Jamshoro under Section 324, 337-F(v), 504, 34 PPC . Earlier, the applicant/accused had approached the trial Court by filing Cr. bail application No.1039 of 2024 but the same was dismissed vide order dated 30.09.2025. 2. The details and particulars of the FIR are already available in the bail application, and the same may be gathered from the copy of the FIR attached to this application. Hence, there is no need to reproduce them here. 3. At the outset, learned counsel for the applicant submits that due to intervention of Nek-Mards of locality, the parties have compromised outside the Court . Complainant Sher Dil (CNIC No.44204-8908656-1) is present and has recorded his objection for grant of bail to the applicant/accused. 4. On the other hand, in view of the no objection rendered by learned counsel for the complainant, learned D.P.G has also recorded his no objection for grant of bail to the applicant however, states that the offence with which the applicant stands charged is compoundable. 5. In view of the above, since the parties have patched up outside the Court and the complainant rendered his no objection to the confirmation of bail to the applicant/accused, instant Cr.

Bail Application is allowed. Resultantly the interim pre-arrest bail granted to the applicant vide order dated 08.10.2025 is hereby confirmed on same terms and conditions.

JUDGE *Hafiz Fahad*

Related Legal Research & Directories