Al Wakeelo
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Petitioner: ARBELO VS Respondent: THE STATE
Court Name: Sindh High Court Judge(s): Munib Ahmed Khan Title: ARBELO vs THE STATE Case No.: Criminal Bail Application No,99 of 2007 Date of Judgment:2007-05-07 Reported As: 2008 P Cr. L J 431 Result: Order accordingly
Judgment ORDER MUNIB AHMAD KHAN, J.--- After arguing to some extent, learned counsel for the applicant submits that he has repeated bail application before the trial Court but it has been dismissed and now the trial Court is lying vacant for the last about 6 months. Mr. Ghanght a has opposed the bail application on merits but has no objection if the transfer of the case is considered. In the circumstances, the Sessions Judge, Shikarpur is directed to recall the case file from the trial Court and either to continue himself with the case or may assign it to any other Additional Sessions Judge. Both the learned counsel agreed that the abductee Mst. Badsha is to be examined first and thereafter the complainant is to be examined. This exercise is to be done expeditiously and if possible within a period of 4 months whereafter the applicant may move the bail application before the trial Court. With this observation, bail application stands disposed of.