Al Wakeelo logo

Al Wakeelo

Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty

Initializing Secure Chambers

1998 SCMR 1098

MUHAMMAD MUJEEB AHSAN VS SECRETARY, ESTABLISHMENT DIVISION

Petitioner: MUHAMMAD MUJEEB AHSAN VS Respondent: SECRETARY, ESTABLISHMENT DIVISIONHonorable Justice MUHAMMAD BASHIR JEHANGIRI,Nemo

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan

Full Judgment Text & Judicial Ruling

1998 S C M R 1098

1998 S C M R 1098

[Supreme Court of Pakistan]

Present: Saleem Akhtar, Mamoon Kazi and Muhammad Bashir Jehangiri, JJ

MUHAMMAD MUJEEB AHSAN---Petitioner

versus

SECRETARY, ESTABLISHMENT DIVISION and others---Respondents

Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 16 of 1995, decided on 4;k June, 1995.

(On appeal from the judgment of the Federal Service Tribunal dated 11-10-1994 passed in Appeal No. 373-R of 1994).

Constitution of Pakistan (1973)---

----Art. 212(3)---Seniority---Leave to appeal was granted to examine whether a civil servant was entitled to the ante-date seniority from the date his juniors and batchmates had been promoted after the Service Tribunal had declared him entitled to promotion.

Petitioner in person.

Nemo for Respondents.

Date of hearing: 4th June, 1995.

ORDER

MUHAMMAD BASHIR JEHANGIRI, J.---Muhammad Mujeeb Ahsan, petitioner, seeks leave to appeal against the judgment of the Federal Service Tribunal dated 11-10-1994 whereby his claim to promotion in BPS-18 with effect from 15-6-1991 instead of 3-12-1992 was not maintained.

2. The petitioner joined Pakistan Ordnance Factories on 3-8-1982 as Assistant Works Manager/Chemical, P.O.F., Havelian, in BPS-17. Being aggrieved of the order dated 15-6-1991 ignoring him from promotion to BPS-18 the petitioner after exhausting the departmental remedy filed an appeal on 28-10-1991 before the Federal Service Tribunal seeking a direction to the Chairman, P.O.F. Board for considering him "for promotion to the post of Works Manager/Chemical according to his eligibility and seniority with effect from the date his juniors and batchmates were promoted".

3. The Service Tribunal after hearing the parties "accepted the appeal with the direction that the appellant may be considered for promotion by the Department following the Promotion Rules as faithfully as the spirit of rules requires of a good citizen". In consequence, the petitioner was promoted to the post of Works Manager/Chemical in BPS-18 with effect from 3-12-1992, instead of 15-6-1991. Feeling still dissatisfied, the petitioner filed an appeal, out of which this petition has arisen, for a direction to notify his promotion in BPS-18 with effect from 15-6-1991, the date on which his batchmates and juniors had been promoted. The learned Service Tribunal vide impugned judgment dismissed the appeal in limine.

4. The petitioner appeared in person and contended that the learned Service Tribunal has committed a material irregularity by holding that he had been duly considered by the D.P.C. and having been promoted to BPS-18 his grievance had been redressed in terms of its judgment dated 6-5-1992.

5. Leave to appeal is granted to examine whether a civil servant is entitled to the ante-date seniority from the date his juniors and batchmates had been promoted after the Federal Service Tribunal had declared him entitled to promotion?

M.B.A./M-90/S Leave granted.

Related Legal Research & Directories