Al Wakeelo logo

Al Wakeelo

Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty

Initializing Secure Chambers

Cr.Bail 207/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas - Muhammad Islam (Applicant) — 2024 SHC 231

Official Citation: 2024 SHC 231

Court / Jurisdiction: Sindh High Court

Petitioner: Cr.Bail 207/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas - Muhammad Islam (Applicant)

Legal Principle & Question Decided

Ruling Summary: This decision was rendered by the Sindh High Court, officially reported as 2024 SHC 231. In this matter between Cr.Bail 207/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas - Muhammad Islam (Applicant) and the Respondent, the court adjudicated key questions of statutory construction, procedural regularity, and legal precedent under Pakistani law.

Core Holding: The honorable bench evaluated governing statutory provisions and judicial authorities to establish the rights of the parties, delivering the binding reasoning set out below.

Full Judgment Text & Judicial Ruling

COURT: Sindh High Court CASE NO: Cr.Bail 207/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas CITATION: 2024 SHC MPK 1116 PARTIES: Muhammad Islam (Applicant) ORDER DATE: 26-SEP-24 BENCH: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) A.F.R: Yes ------------------------------------------------------------ IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH CIRCUIT COURT MIRPURKHAS Constitutional Petition No.S-207 of 2024 (Ali Akber Vs. P.O Sindh and others)

DATE ORDER WITH SIGNATURE OF JUDGE Date of hearing and order 24-09-2024. Mr. Aimen Ali Memon advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Dilawar Hussain Panhwer advocate for respondent No.06 Mr. Mujeeb-ur-Rehman Shar respondent No.7 Mr. Dhani Bakhsh Mari, Assistant P.G a/w Inspector Nazeer Ahmed Halepoto SHO P.S Khan , and Inspector Abdul Majeed Gurgaij SHO P.S Gharibabad.

= O R D E R Adnan-ul-Karim, Memon, J. Petitioner Ali Akber through instant petition is seeking directions to the official respondents not to cause harassment to him at the behest of private respondents and to provide protection to him. 2. The learned counsel (s) for the private respondent s and learned A.P.G with one voice state that neither they caused harassment to the petitioner nor they intend to do so in the future. Learned A.P.G further states that protection will be provided to the petitioner in accordance with law. 3. In view of above, this petition is disposed of with the direction that no harassment shall be caused to the petitioner and police shall be neutral in private affairs; however, if any cognizable offen se is committed police shall be free to take action in accordance with law. JUDGE

*Ali Sher*

Related Legal Research & Directories