Al Wakeelo
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Petitioner: NASEEB KHAN VS Respondent: HAKIM ALI and otherss
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pakistan Judge(s): Khalil-ur-Rehman Ramday, Tasaddaq Hussain Jillani Title: NASEEB KHAN vs HAKIM ALI and otherss Case No.: Cr. P.L.A. No,667-L of 2004 Date of Judgment:2005-07-20 Reported As: 2006 SCMR 1532 Result: Leave refused
Judgment ORDER ' The main reason which had weighed with the learned High Court in suspending the sentence awarded to Hakim Ali respondent was that the injury attributed to him on the head of the deceased was not found to exist. The learned Advocate Supreme Court tried to persuade us to hold that a bruise which was found on the left side of the face of the deceased, which is described as injury No,1 in the post-mortem report, should be declared to be an injury on the head of the deceased. 2. We are afraid that it is not possible for us to give any such interpretation to a part of the body, which according to the doctor is the face and not the head. We have not been able to find any illegality in the discretion exercised by the learned High Court in releasing the respondent on bail. This petition is therefore, dismissed. .