Al Wakeelo
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Petitioner: PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT VS Respondent: MERA JAN
2015 G B L R 361 [Supreme Appellate Court] Before Dr. Rana Muhammad Shamim, C.J. and Raja Jalal-ud-Din, J PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT and others---Petitioners Versus MERA JAN and others---Respondents C. Misc. No. 116 of 2015 in C.P.L.A. No. 43 of 2013, heard on 23rd November, 2015. Civil service--- ----Appointment--- Writ petition of candidates was allowed by the Chief Court and authorities were directed to adjust the petitioners against the posts of Nursing Assistants in the Health Department according to the recruitment policy---Authorities were directed by the Supreme Appellate Court to decide the case in accordance with the "recruitment policy" and law on merits within a period of three months.
Advocate Gilgit-Balstistan along with Ali Nazar Khan, Advocate-on-Record for Petitioners. Amjad Hussain, Advocate along with Johar Ali Khan, Advocate-on-Record for Respondents. Date of hearing: 23rd November, 2015. ORDER DR. RANA MUHAMMAD SHAMIM, C.J.---Mr. Amjad Hussain learned counsel for the respondents has drawn the attention of this Court at the last Para of the Impugned Judgment in Writ Petition No. 61/2009, dated 05.12.2012, passed by the learned Chief Court Gilgit-Baltistan. Which is re-produced as under:- Quoted:-. "In the circumstance, we allow this petition; respondents are directed to adjust the petitioners against the posts of Nursing Assistants in the Health Department of District Diamer according to the Policy available for recruitment". Unquoted:- In view of the above, the learned counsel contends that the petitioners Nos. 2 to 4, may decide the case of the respondents in pursuance of the policy available for recruitment. The learned advocate General Gilgit-Baltistan has luke warmly agreed to remand the case and the respondents may approach the petitioners Nos. 2 to 4 for redressal of their grievances in accordance with law. In view of the above discussion, we direct the petitioners Nos.2 to 4 to decide the case of the respondents independently in accordance with the "Recruitment Policy" and law on merits, within a period of three (03) months. The copy of this order be supplied to learned Advocate General Gilgit-Baltistan. The petition is disposed off in above terms. HBT/224/GB Order accordingly.