Al Wakeelo
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Petitioner: ABDUL HAMEED VS Respondent: COMMISSIONER, BAHAWALPUR DIVISION
1988 S C M R 1972
1988 S C M R 1972
Present: Ghulan Mujaddid Mirza and Saad Saood Jan, JJ
ABDUL HAMEED‑‑Petitioner
versus
THE COMMISSIONER, BAHAWALPUR DIVISION and others‑‑Respondents
Civil Petition No.34 of 1982, decided on 17th July, 1988.
(From the judgment of Punjab Service Tribunal dated 14‑12‑1981 in Appeal No.182/1046 of 1981).
Punjab Service Tribunals Act (IX of 1974)‑‑
‑‑‑S.4 ‑Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 212(3)‑‑Dismissal of appeal by Service Tribunal, challenged‑‑Procedure adopted by departmental authority fully in accordance with law and no violation of any positive Rules committed‑‑No. legal flaw found in impugned judgment and no ground for leave to appeal made out‑‑Petition dismissed.
Ch.Mushtaq Masood, Advocate Supreme Court and Ch.Mehdi Khan Mehtab, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner.
Nemo for Respondents.
Date of hearing: 17th July, 1988.
ORDER
GHULAM MUJADDID MIRZA, J.‑‑Abdul Hameed ex‑Patwari Rahimyar Khan Circle, Tehsil Sadiqabad, District Rahimyar Khan at present resident of Khairpur Tameewali, District Bahawalpur seeks leave to appeal against the judgment of the Punjab Service Tribunal dated 14‑12‑1981 whereby his appeal against the order of the respondents was dismissed.
We have heard learned counsel for the petitioner who tried to find out some legal flaw in the impugned judgment but could not do so. On the other hand we agree with the following observation of the Tribunal:‑---
"In the light of the above discussions we are of the considered opinion that the procedure adopted by the A.C. was fully in accordance with the law and no violation of any positive rules has been committed."
No ground for leave to appeal is made out.
M.I./A‑320/5 Petition dismissed.