Al Wakeelo
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Petitioner: RAJA JAMIL alias JAMSHED VS Respondent: THE STATE
Court Name: Sindh High Court Judge(s): Ghulam Nabi Soomro, Muhammad Mujeebullah Siddiqui Title: RAJA JAMIL alias JAMSHED vs THE STATE Case No.: Cr1. Miscellaneous Application No,7 of 2004 Date of Judgment:2003-02-18 Reported As: 2005 YLR 1292 Result: Petition allowed
Judgment ORDER ' Through this petition under section 561-A, Cr.P.C., the applicant Raja Jamil alias Jamshed son of Muhammad Rafiq, who stands convicted separately in two cases bearing F.I.R. No,191 of 1995 under sections 324/353/34, P.P.C. And F.I.R. No,192 of 1995 under section 13-D Arms Ordinance, both registered at Police Station, Defence, sentenced to different sentences of imprisonment by the Ist Additional Sessions Judge, Karachi (South), prays running of such sentences concurrently. ' The learned counsel contends that the arms case in F.I.R. No,192 of 1995 under section 13-(D) and the main case F.I.R. No,191 of 1995 under sections 324/ 353/34, P.P.C. Were registered on the same day i.e, 12-11-2001, the arms case, being the offshoot of the main case. In support of his contention he has placed before us a Photostat copy of an unreported judgment passed in Crl. Miscellaneous No,344 of 1998 dated 4-2-1999. ' Mr. Habib Ahmed, learned A.A.-G. On the other hand, states that it is purely the discretion of the Courts to allow such benefit and the trial Court's order is silent in that regard. ' Having gone through the above referred judgment, we are of the view that the applicant is entitled in the relief prayed by him. ' Accordingly we direct that the sentences passed against the applicant in the aforesaid two cases shall run concurrently. Disposed of.
---
## Page 2
revisions by the competent authorities. Therefore, it is advisable to consult the official sources or legal professionals for the most up-to-date and accurate information.