Al Wakeelo
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Petitioner: MIAN ABDUL WAHEED VS Respondent: THE STATE
1988 P Cr
1988 P Cr. L J 371
[Karachi]
Before Mamoon Kazi, J
Mian ABDUL WAHEED‑‑Applicant
versus
THE STATE‑‑Respondent
Special Criminal Bail Application No. 62 of 1987, decided on 2nd August, 1987.
Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑
‑‑‑S. 497‑‑Customs Act (IV of 1969), S. 156(1)89‑‑Bail, grant of‑‑Out of 160 bags of pulses recovered from co‑accused, 4 bags of heroin found‑‑Accused not owner of premises from where goods seized‑‑No notice under S.171, Customs Act served on accused‑‑Case found to be of further enquiry‑‑Bail granted in circumstances.
Rana M. Shamim for Applicant.
Abdul Sattar for the State.
ORDER
According to the allegations 160 bags of pulses were stored in the premises belonging to co‑accused Sher Zaman and four bags out of them were found to contain heroin powder. The gross weight of the contraband goods is shown in the challan to be 128 Kgs. The only allegation against the present accused, according to the challan, is that he had conspired with the co‑accused Sher Zaman, who is absconding, in purchase of the bags.
The contentions of Mr. Rana M. Shamim, learned counsel fore the applicant are that admittedly the applicant is not the owner oil the premises from where the contraband goods have allegedly been seized and further that notice under section 171 of the Customs Act was not served upon the applicant before his arrest which is a mandatory requirement of law. The factual position stated by learned counsel is not controverted by the prosecution. Consequently, I agree with Mr. Rana M. Shamim that this is a case for further enquiry as contemplated by section 497(2), Cr.P.C.
Bail is, therefore, granted to the applicant in the sum of Rs . 2, 50, 000 with one surety to the satisfaction of the learned Special Judge (Customs), Karachi. Mr. Abdul Sattar states that only interim challan has been filed before the Court and the investigation is still containing. The applicant is, therefore, directed and he should also present himself for the purposes of investigation as and when required by them.
S.A./A‑223/K Bail allowed.