Al Wakeelo
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Petitioner: MUHAMMAD SIDDIQUE VS Respondent: S.H.O., POLICE STATION NANKANA and another-
Court Name: Lahore High Court Judge(s): Raja Afrasiab Khan Title: MUHAMMAD SIDDIQUE vs S.H.O., POLICE STATION NANKANA and another- Case No.: Civil Miscellaneous No.1938 in Writ Petition No.1002 of 1991 Date of Judgment:1991-05-06 Reported As: 1991 P Cr. L J 2390 Result: Order accordingly
Judgment ORDER Learned counsel contends that a cognizable offence has been committed by the accused and that an information was conveyed by the petitioner Muhammad Siddique father of the abductee, Mst. Nasreen for registration of a criminal case. According to the learned counsel, no action has been taken by the respondent S.H.O., Police Station Nankana. Learned Law Officer has also been heard. 2. In the peculiar circumstances of the case, statement of petitioner Muhammad Siddique shall be recorded by the S.H.O. Police Station Nankana. In case he comes to the conclusion that some cognizable offence has been committed by the accused, he will feel no hesitation in registering a case against the accused. With this observation. This miscellaneous application stands disposed of.