Al Wakeelo
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Petitioner: FAZAL BEGUM And Others VS Respondent: Sh. IJAZ AHMAD And Other
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pakistan Judge(s): Nasim Hasan Shah, Muhammad Afzal Zullah, Aslam Riaz Hussain Title: FAZAL BEGUM And Others vs Sh. IJAZ AHMAD And Other Case No.:Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 489 of 1985 Revision No. 997 of
1982 Date of Judgment:1985-06-21 Reported As: 1985 SCMR 1928 Result: Petition dismissed Judgment ORDER ASLAM RIAZ HUSSAIN, J.--Facts giving rise to the petition are, briefly, that Inayat Hussain and Siraj Din predecessor-in-interest of the petitioners filed a suit against the respondents for declaration that they were joint owners of the suit land belonging to Ejaz Ahmad respondent No. 1 and that Muhammad Hussain respondent No. 2 illegally occupied the said land as he had no right therein. They also prayed for consequential relief by way of permanent injunction restraining the respondents from utilizing certain portions of the said land. 2. Alongwith the plaint they also filed an application under Order XXXIX, rules 1 and 2, C.P.C. Praying for interim injunction restraining the respondents from raising any construction over the land comprising Khasra No. 4237, during the pendency of the suit. This application, was, however rejected by the learned trial Court on 27-2-1982. The plaintiffs thereupon filed an appeal against the above-noted order whereupon the Additional District Judge granted interim injunction on 2-6- 1982. The respondents assailed this order through a revision. The High Court accepted the revision vide the well-considered and lengthy order, set aside the order of the Additional District Judge and vacated the stay order granted by him. 3. We have heard the petitioners' counsel at some length. He has not been able to make out any ground for interference in the impugned order by this Court. 4. It may, however, be mentioned that in case the respondents raise any construction over the Khasra No. 4237 during the pendency of the suit or the subsequent proceedings they shall do so at their own risk and cost. 5. With the above observations the petition is dismissed.