Al Wakeelo
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Petitioner: KHALID MEHMOOD and others VS Respondent: THE STATE and others
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pakistan Judge(s): Mian Saqib Nisar, Asif Saeed Khan Khosa, Tasaddaq Hussain Jillani Title: KHALID MEHMOOD and others vs THE STATE and others Case No.: Criminal Petition No, 413-L of 2011 Date of Judgment:2011-06-28 Reported As: 2011 SCMR 1719 Result: Bail granted
JUDGMENT
JUDGMENT ' TASSADUQ HUSSAIN JILLANI, J.---On Court query, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners do not claim possession of the shop/subject matter of the case, registered vide F.I.R. No,86 of 2011 Police Station Rinala Khurd in which pre-arrest bail is sought and the case has been registered on account of some misunderstanding. 2. Learned Additional Prosecutor-General, Punjab states that although the allegation of breaking the lock of the shop is admitted but since petitioners do not claim possession, the investigation agency shall proceed accordingly. He does not deny that the petitioners had joined the investigation and nothing is to be recovered from them*. 3. In view of the above, as petitioners do not claim possession of the shop/subject matter of the F.I.R. And nothing is to be recovered from them, this petition is converted into appeal and the same is allowed and, resultantly, the petitioners are admitted to bail, subject to their furnishing bail bond in the sum of Rs, 20,000 (Rupees twenty thousand only) with one surety each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court.