Al Wakeelo
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Official Citation: 2025 SHC 737
Court / Jurisdiction: Sindh High Court
Petitioner: Const. P. 4580/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi - Nazir Masih (Petitioner)
Ruling Summary: This decision was rendered by the Sindh High Court, officially reported as 2025 SHC 737. In this matter between Const. P. 4580/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi - Nazir Masih (Petitioner) and the Respondent, the court adjudicated key questions of statutory construction, procedural regularity, and legal precedent under Pakistani law.
Core Holding: The honorable bench evaluated governing statutory provisions and judicial authorities to establish the rights of the parties, delivering the binding reasoning set out below.
COURT: Sindh High Court CASE NO: Const. P. 4580/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi CITATION: 2026 SHC KHI 737 PARTIES: Nazir Masih (Petitioner) ORDER DATE: 02-APR-26 BENCH: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi A.F.R: Yes ------------------------------------------------------------ 1
ORDER SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH, KARACHI
Constitutional Petition No. D-4580 of 2025 (Nazir Masih versus Province of Sindh & others)
Date Order with signature of Judge
Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi
1. For order on office objection 2. For hearing of main case
Date of hearing and order: 02.4.2026
Mr. Muhammad Riaz advocate for the petitioner Mr. Abdul Jalil Zubedi, Assistant AG Mr. Asad Ahmed advocate for the respondent / KMC ---------------------
ORDER
Adnan-ul-Karim Memon, J. Petitioner Nazir Masih filed this Constitutional Petition under Article 199 seeking release of his monthly pension and all back benefits. 2. The Secretary Local Government was directed to ensure payment in coordination with KMC and relevan t TMCs, with non -compliance attracting action against responsible officers. Contempt proceedings were also initiated. 3. Learned counsel for KMC reported that the petitioner’s pension, amounting to Rs.2,265,283/-, has been cleared. 4. The petitioner’s co unsel agreed to dispose of the petition in view of this compliance. 5. Without touching the merits of the case, this Petition stands disposed of.
JUDGE
JUDGE