Al Wakeelo
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Petitioner: Muhammad Adrees VS Respondent: District & Sessions Judge
Court Name: Lahore High Court Judge(s): Syed Mansoor Ali Shah Title: Muhammad Adrees vs District & Sessions Judge Case No.: W.P. No. 18331 of 2015 Date of Judgment:2015-07-07 Reported As: PLJ 2021 Lahore 628 Result: Petition dismissed
Judgment ORDER Sole grievance of the petitioner is that his name was not included in the merit list prepared after the written test for 13 posts of Naib Qasid. He additionally submits that paper of the petitioner was not even marked by the concerned authorities as the same was misplaced by the respondent. 2. On the other hand Superintendent of District Judiciary submits that on the application of the petitioner , paper of the petitioner was traced from the record and has been duly marked by the concerned authority . The petitioner has secured 32 marks out of 40 while the merit was fixed at 34 marks. The written paper of the petitioner has been brought to the Court and shown to the petitioner , who acknowledged it to be his paper . As the petitioner secured less marks, he did not meet the threshold qualification of 34 marks and was not called for the interview . 3. There is no merit in the instant petition, which is, therefore, dismissed.