Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Petitioner: TAHIR MANSOOR VS Respondent: SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, BAHAWALNAGARHonorable Justice MUHAMMAD MEHMUD ASLAM PIRZADA
1992 P L C (C
1992 P L C (C.S.) 1051
[Service Tribunal Punjab]
Present: Muhammad Mehmud Aslam Pirzada Chairman and Abdul Hamid Khan, Member
TAHIR MANSOOR
versus
SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, BAHAWALNAGAR and 2 others
Appeal No. 385/1013 of 1988, decided on 18th August, 1990.
Civil service---
---- Adverse remarks---Remarks Integrity controversial' reported against civil servant, a police officer were vague and indefinite and were not supported by any material available on record---Authorities had failed to point out that there was any complaint against civil servant by public or there was any other allegation regarding his integrity---No warning was issued to civil servant during period in question---If Government servant was branded to be not a man of integrity, a mere writing in A.C.R. could not be considered as whole truth---Other adverse remarks being "number and percentage of convictions in Haood cases below Average" also were recorded due to some misunderstanding---Service Tribunal set aside orders of Authorities with direction to expunge same from A.C.R. of civil servant.
MA. Riaz for Appellant. A.G. Humayun, District Attorney for Respondents.
Date of hearing: 7th August, 1990.