Al Wakeelo logo

Al Wakeelo

Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty

Initializing Secure Chambers

1985 SCMR 2032

Messrs NARUMAL JETOMAL And Another vs SPECIAL COURT OF SIND And

Petitioner: Messrs NARUMAL JETOMAL And Another VS Respondent: SPECIAL COURT OF SIND And Other

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan Decision Date: 1982-03-29

Full Judgment Text & Judicial Ruling

Court Name: Supreme Court of Pakistan Judge(s): Zaffar Hussain Mirza, Abdul Qadir Sheikh, S. A. Nusrat Title:Messrs NARUMAL JETOMAL And Another vs SPECIAL COURT OF SIND And

Other Case No.: Constitutional Petition No. 1009 of 1981 Civil Petition No. K-2 of 1982 Date of Judgment:1982-03-29 Reported As: 1985 SCMR 2032 Result: Leave granted Judgment ORDER ABDUL KADIR SHAIKH, J.--Facts of this case briefly stated are that petitioners were granted cash credit facility by Allied Bank of Pakistan Limited, respondent No. 2, on the pledge of their stocks of paddy in their Rice Mill. In 1976, petitioners' Rice Mill and the other Rice Mills in Pakistan were nationalised, and accordingly not only the Rice Mill belonging to the petitioners but also the stocks of paddy lying there were taken over by the Government. The stocks of paddy pledged with the respondent No. 2 were sold at their instance and respondent No. 2 afterwards filed a suit against the petitioners for recovery of Rs.6,23,034 due against the cash credit facility granted to them. The suit was afterwards transferred for trial before the Judge of the Special Court established under the Banking Companies (Recovery of Loans) Ordinance, 1979. Petitioners filed a petition under Article 9 of the Provisional Constitution Order, 1981 in Sind High Court seeking to challenge the jurisdiction of the Judge of the Special Court on the ground that he was not competent to deal with the suit. The petition was dismissed by the High Court, and petitioners now seek leave to appeal. Mr. Mamoon Kazi, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that in view of the fact that the Rice Milling Corporation of Pakistan and the Government are necessary parties, and in fact should be the main defendants, the suit under the special provisions of the Banking Ordinance is not competent. This point of law and the others raised in support of the petition deserve consideration. Leave is granted. Security Rs.2, 500.

Related Legal Research & Directories