Al Wakeelo
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Petitioner: AKHTAR ALI VS Respondent: MINT MASTER, PAKISTAN MINT, LAHORE
1992 P L C (C
1992 P L C (C.S.) 1338
[Federal Service Tribunal]
Before Ch. Hasan Nawaz and Muhammad Ismail, Members
AKHTAR ALI
versus
MINT MASTER, PAKISTAN MINT, LAHORE and another
Appeal No. 367(I) of 1988, decided on 16th March, 1992.
(a) Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973)---
----S. 4---Appeal---Limitation---Civil servant's appeal after lapse of ten years against promotion of respondent/ civil servant being time-barred was dismissed in circumstances.
(b) Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973)---
----S. 4---Appeal filed beyond period of limitation unaccompanied by application for condonation of delay---Civil servant's such appeal could not be entertained in circumstances.
(c) Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973)---
----S. 4(1)(b)---Appeal---Prayer for promotion of civil servant and for be given under provision of S.4 (1)(b), Service Tribunals Act, was not competent in circumstances.
(d) Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973)---
----S. 4---Appeal---Competency---No departmental appeal filed by civil servant before filing present appeal---No appeal would lie to Service Tribunal unless aggrieved civil servant had preferred appeal/ representation to Departmental Authority and period of ninety days had elapsed from date on which such appeal/representation was preferred---Time-barred departmental appeal/representation would be of no avail---Appeal was dismissed as being incompetent and time-barred.
Faiz Muhammad Bhatti for Appellant.
Hafiz Tariq Naseem for Respondents.
Respondent No. 2 in person.
Date of hearing: 9th March, 199d.