Al Wakeelo
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Petitioner: Mian MUHAMMAD IMRAN VS Respondent: PARAMOUNT ENGINEERING WORKS
Court Name: Environmental Tribunal Judge(s): Khawaja Muhammad Afzal, Ch. Khalil, Gulzar Butt Title: Mian MUHAMMAD IMRAN vs PARAMOUNT ENGINEERING WORKS Case No.: Private Complaint No, 43 of 2008 Date of Judgment:2011-03-29 Reported As: 2011 CLD 1189 Result: Order accordingly
Judgment ORDER ' The only witness of the respondent who remains to be examined is in attendance but the learned counsel for the complainant is on strike at the call of Punjab Bar Council. ' Adjourned to 20-4-2011 for the evidence of the said witness. If the complainant's counsel does not appear on the adjourned date his right of cross-examination shall abate. (Sd)/- (Sd)/- Khawaj a Muhammad Afzal Ch. Khalil (Chairperson) (Member Tech.) ' I have gone through the order sheet of the case and find out that the statement of accused under section 342 has not been recorded immediately after the prosecution evidence is completed. This may be termed as great violation of the mandatory provision of section 342, Cr.P.C. Resultantly, the whole trial can be vitiated. Therefore, in my view it is necessary to record the statement of the respondent accused under section 342, Cr.P.C. Before proceeding further. (Sd)/- Ms. Gulzar Butt (Member Legal)