Al Wakeelo
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Official Citation: 2024 SHC 3245
Court / Jurisdiction: Sindh High Court
Petitioner: Const. P. 219/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi - Mst. Dua (Anita) and Another (Petitioner)
Ruling Summary: This decision was rendered by the Sindh High Court, officially reported as 2024 SHC 3245. In this matter between Const. P. 219/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi - Mst. Dua (Anita) and Another (Petitioner) and the Respondent, the court adjudicated key questions of statutory construction, procedural regularity, and legal precedent under Pakistani law.
Core Holding: The honorable bench evaluated governing statutory provisions and judicial authorities to establish the rights of the parties, delivering the binding reasoning set out below.
COURT: Sindh High Court CASE NO: Const. P. 219/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi CITATION: 2025 SHC KHI 3245 PARTIES: Mst. Dua (Anita) and Another (Petitioner) ORDER DATE: 03-NOV-25 BENCH: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) A.F.R: Yes ------------------------------------------------------------ [1]
ORDER SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH AT KARACHI
Civil Revision No.219 of 2024
Date Order with signature of Judge(s)
For order on CMA No.7570/2025 (Restoration)
03.11.2025
None present for the applicant --------------------------------
This civi l revision application was disposed of with directions to the concerned authorities to allow the applicant to participate in allotment proceedings of the subject plot whenever it is made, which is subject to all just exceptions as provided under the law. Thereafter an application under Section 114 CPC was filed and since nobody bothered to put appearance to assist this Court, again the matter was adjourned to 08.9.2025, however, on that date nobody was in attendance and the review application was dismissed in default vide order dated 08.9.2025. Now the restoration application has been preferred, however, today, the applicant is called absent without intimation . Perhaps the applicant has l ost interest in the listed restoration application, which is accordingl y dismissed for non-prosecution.
JUDGE
Zahid/*