Al Wakeelo
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Petitioner: EMPLOYEES UNION C.B.A. VS Respondent: STATE BANK OF PAKISTAN
1988 P L C 734
1988 P L C 734
[1st Labour Court Punjab]
Present: Salah‑ud‑Din Zafar, Presiding Officer
EMPLOYEES UNION C.B.A.
Versus
STATE BANK OF PAKISTAN and another
Petition No.9 of 1986, decided on 20th November, 1986.
Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969)‑‑
‑‑‑Ss. 22(12) & 23‑‑Subscription of Labour union members‑‑Mode of collection‑‑Collection of subscription by employer‑Management was not prohibited by any provision of law from entering into voluntary agreement with any rival Labour Union within its Organisation to collect subscriptions toward Union's funds‑‑Such agreement with express consent of members of Union, was not directly or indirectly violative of law‑‑Petition of C. B. A. Union under section 34 for preventing deductions of subscription towards funds of rival union was dismissed by Labour Court.
H.R. Haider for Petitioner.
K.H. Khursheed for Respondent No.l.
Malik Muhammad Asghar for Respondent No.2.
ORDER
The State Bank of Pakistan Employees' Union (registered) had acquired the status of C.B.A., in the State Bank through Referendum. The Friends Workers' Union is the rival