Al Wakeelo
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Petitioner: COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX VS Respondent: SHRI RAM AVTAR
Court Name: Punjab and Haryana High Court Judge(s): V. Ramaswa mi, G. R. Majithia Title: COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs SHRI RAM AVTAR Case No.: Case No. 74 of 1981 Date of Judgment:1988-08-23 Reported As: 1991 PTD 270 Result: Order accordingly
JUDGMENT
JUDGMENT V. RAMASWAMI, C.J.--We are satisfied that the following question of law does arise from out of the order of the Tribunal. Accordingly, we direct the Tribunal to state a case and refer the following question of law to this Court for its opinion: "Whether. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in law in upholding the finding of the Appellate Assistant Commissioner that the interest payable on the deposits standing in the names of minors could not be treated as income arising directly or indirectly from their admission to the benefits of the partnership so as to attract the provisions of section 64(l)(iii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and be included in the total income of the assessee?"