Al Wakeelo
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Citation: 1971 PLC 115
Court: Labour Court
Year: 1970
Decision Date: 1970-07-18
Parties: MAFIZUR RAHMAN vs MESSRS J. J. REHBACH (PAK.) LTD., CHITTAGONG
Case cited as 1971 PLC 115
Court Name: Labour Court Judge(s): M. A. Sabur, Ms. Nurul Huda, M. A. Meerza Title: MAFIZUR RAHMAN vs MESSRS J. J. REHBACH (PAK.) LTD., CHITTAGONG Case No.: Complaint Case No. 426 of 1969 Date of Judgment:1970-07-18 Reported As: 1971 PLC 115 Result: N/A Judgment ORDER MD. NURUL HUDA (CHAIRMAN). This case arises out of an application under section 25 of the East Pakistan Employment of Labour (Standing Orders) Act, 1965 filed by, petitioner Mafizur Rahman. His case is that he was in service of the second party as Darwan. On 27-2-1969 in the morning when he attended his duty he found the lock of the door of the office broken. He pointed out this to the Manager of the second party in presence of Darwan Gulfaraz Khan who was on duty in the night. Any way both the petitioner and Gulfaraz were suspended. The petitioner submitted explanation, but there was no reply to that. The petitioner then sent two registered letters requesting the second party to withdraw the suspension order. Ultimately the second party informed the petitioner by the letter, dated 14-7-1969 that he had been dismissed from service with effect from 24-3-1969. This order of dismissal is in violation of mandatory provisions of law and illegal. The petitioner submitted grievance petition, dated 24-7-1969 and got reply to that on 20-8-1969. The petitioner now prays for re-instatement in his job with all back wages. Second party contests the case by filing written objection wherein the allegations of the petitioner…
Read the full judgment on Al Wakeelo — Pakistan's AI-powered legal research platform.