MD. SHAHIDUL HOQUE vs MESSRS ART PRESS, CHITTAGONG — 1971 PLC 539

Citation: 1971 PLC 539

Court: Labour Court

Year: 1970

Decision Date: 1970-09-03

Parties: MD. SHAHIDUL HOQUE vs MESSRS ART PRESS, CHITTAGONG

Headnotes

Case cited as 1971 PLC 539

Judgment Text

Court Name: Labour Court Judge(s): Juned Ahmed Chaudhry, M. A. Subur, Ms. Nurul Huda Title: MD. SHAHIDUL HOQUE vs MESSRS ART PRESS, CHITTAGONG Case No.: Complaint Case No. 465 of 1969 Date of Judgment:1970-09-03 Reported As: 1971 PLC 539 Result: N/A Judgment ORDER MD. NURUL HUDA (CHAIRMAN): This case arises out of an application under section 25(1)(6) of the East Pakistan Employment of Labour (Standing Orders) Act. The petitioner Shahidul Hoque alleges that he was working as machineman under the 2nd party, Messrs Art Press since 25-5-67 and that he took leave from 26-7-69 to 5-8-69 but could not report to his duty on 6-8-69 for certain difficulties as alleged in his application. He, how over, reported on 11-8-69, but he was not allowed to work and charge-sheeted on 12-8-69 for absenting without leave for more thin 10 days from 26- 7-69. The petitioner alleges that he submitted explanation to the charge, but that was; not duly considered. There was enquiry., on the charge and it was verbally intimated on 12-9-69 to the petitioner by the manager of the 2nd party that he had been dismissed from service. Thereupon the petitioner submitted a grievance petition as provided by law, but there was no reply to, that. So the petitioner has come before the Court with a prayer for re-instatement in service. 2nd party contests the case by filling a written statement r wherein there is a denial to all the material allegations of the petitioner. It has been contended by the 2nd party that…

Read the full judgment on Al Wakeelo — Pakistan's AI-powered legal research platform.