Al Wakeelo
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Petitioner: FAIZ AHMAD VS Respondent: INSPECTOR-GENERAL OF POLICE, PUNJAB, LAHORE.Honorable Justice ABDUL HAMID KHAN
1992 P L C (C
1992 P L C (C.S.) 1059
[Service Tribunal Punjab]
Present: Muhammad Mehmud Aslam Pirzada, Chairman and Abdul Hamid Khan, Member
FAIZ AHMAD
versus
INSPECTOR-GENERAL OF POLICE, PUNJAB, LAHORE and 2 others
Appeal No. 117/845 of 1988, decided on 6th March, 1990.
Civil service---
---- Punishment of reduction in pay---Civil servant a police officer was awarded punishment of reduction in his pay on charge of misconduct and inefficiency which he showed in not having the eye-witness joined in identification parade which was to be conducted in a criminal case---Evidence on record had fully proved that civil servant was not responsible for absence of eye-witness and it was also established that no material damage had really been done due to absence of eye-witness as conviction was recorded in the case---Charges of misconduct and inefficiency on basis of which punishment of reduction in pay was awarded to civil servant, having not been proved against him in absolute terms, orders of Authorities were set aside.
Ch. Muhammad Hussain for Appellant.
A.G. Humayun, D.A. for Respondents.
Date of hearing: 6th March, 1990.