Al Wakeelo logo

Al Wakeelo

Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty

Initializing Secure Chambers

1988 PCRLJ 1231

ABDUR RASHID ALIAS SHEEDA VS THE STATE

Petitioner: ABDUR RASHID ALIAS SHEEDA VS Respondent: THE STATE

Court: Lahore High Court

Full Judgment Text & Judicial Ruling

1988 P Cr

1988 P Cr. L J 1231

[Lahore]

Before Qurban Sadiq Ikram, J

ABDUR RASHID alias SHEEDA‑‑Petitioner

Versus

THE STATE‑‑Respondent

Criminal Miscellaneous No. 2b88/B of 1987, decided on 22nd September, 1987.

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑

‑‑‑S. 497‑‑Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S. 307‑‑Bail, grant of‑‑Injured person received 6 injuries in all out of which one injury caused on vital part of body resulting in paralysis, restricting movement of victim of assault‑‑Bail refused, in circumstances.

Ch. Bashir Hussain Khalid for Petitioner. Ghulam Mustafa for the State.

Mehr Ghulam Ali Mubashar for the Complainant.

ORDER

The prosecution case in brief is that Abdur Rashid alias Sheeda petitioner on 28‑4‑1987 at about 2‑30 p.m. on Eid Gah Road Rehmanpura gave knife blows to Abdur Rauf. The motive was stated to be that one Muhammad Rafique used to visit the house of the complainant for recitation of Quran but Abdul Rashid accused did not appreciate that visit because Rafique had divorced his maternal‑cousin. Abdul Rauf received six sharp‑edged weapon injuries on his person out of which injury No.6 on back was grievous in nature. The injury had resulted in paralysis restricting the movement of the injured.

2. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and have perused the record. It is correct that at the time of occurrence the age of petitioner was less than 16 years. His date of birth is 18‑8‑1971. He is more than 16 years at this moment. The injured received six injuries in all. Injury No.6 is on vital part of the body and was grievous in nature. The case against the petitioner is not that of further enquiry. It cannot be said at this stage that there are no reasonable grounds for believing that the accused has committed a non‑bailable offence. I, therefore, relying on Arbab Ali v. Khamisu 1985 S C M R 195 dismiss this petition.

S.G.D./A‑237/L Bail refused.

Related Legal Research & Directories