Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Official Citation: 2025 SHC 243
Court / Jurisdiction: Sindh High Court
Petitioner: Const. P. 219/2025 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi - Mst. Kazo and another (Petitioner)
Ruling Summary: This decision was rendered by the Sindh High Court, officially reported as 2025 SHC 243. In this matter between Const. P. 219/2025 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi - Mst. Kazo and another (Petitioner) and the Respondent, the court adjudicated key questions of statutory construction, procedural regularity, and legal precedent under Pakistani law.
Core Holding: The honorable bench evaluated governing statutory provisions and judicial authorities to establish the rights of the parties, delivering the binding reasoning set out below.
COURT: Sindh High Court CASE NO: Const. P. 219/2025 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi CITATION: 2025 SHC KHI 243 PARTIES: Mst. Kazo and another (Petitioner) ORDER DATE: 08-APR-25 BENCH: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) A.F.R: Yes ------------------------------------------------------------ ORDER SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH AT KARACHI C.P No.S-S-219 of 2025 (Mst. Kazo & another v Province of Sindh & others) ______________________________________________________________ Date Order With Signature Of Judge ______________________________________________________________
Date of hearing and order:- 07.04.2025
None present for the Petitioners. Mr. Ali Safdar Depar, AAG. Mr. Qamaruddin No hri, DPG along with SHO Safdar Ali Solangi, PS Jhoke Person, SSP Sujawa l Inspector Muhammad Nawaz, Focal Person, SSP Sujawal SI, Peer Ghulam Nabi Shah PS Mirpur Bathoro -------------
O R D E R
Adnan-ul-Karim Memon, J : P etitioner No.1 Mst. Kazo has contracted marriage with petitioner No.2 Noor Muhammad out of won free will and choise without any coercion despite of opposition from her family members.
2. Learned Assistant P.G. present in Court submits that no harassment shall be caused to the couples on the part of the police. However, the issue of underage if any shall be resolved by the competent forum under the law if the aggrieved party approaches.
3. In view of the above, this petition having served its purpose is disposed of with a direction to the concerned police to provide legal protection to the couple
4. SSP and SHO concerned are also required to protect the petitioners and also secure the PR Bond of the private respondent in the sum of Rs. 500,000/ - (Rupees Five hundred thousand only) each and the same shall be kept in the police station to the effect that no harm shall be caused to the petitioners.
5. In view of the above, this Constitutional Petition is disposed of
JUDGE
Shafi