Al Wakeelo
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Petitioner: SOHAIL ANJAM VS Respondent: SYNDICATE COMMITTEE through Chairman, Baha-ud-Din Zikriyya University, Multan and 3 others
Court Name: Lahore High Court Judge(s): Ijaz Ahmad Chaudhry Title:SOHAIL ANJAM vs SYNDICATE COMMITTEE through Chairman, Baha-ud-Din
Zikriyya University, Multan and 3 others Case No.: Writ Petition No.8417 of 2001 Date of Judgment:2004-06-10 Reported As: 2005 YLR 1623 Result: Order accordingly Judgment ORDER The petitioner having been found guilty by the Syndicate, the result of Part-II and Part-III was quashed. Against the decision of the Syndicate the petitioner also filed representation which is pending before the Chancellor. The decision on the representation of the petitioner by the Chancellor has not been made for the last about two years and the same is still pending. 2. As the petitioner has availed an alternate remedy hence this petition at this stage is not maintainable. However, the Chancellor shall decide the application/ representation of the petitioner as soon as possible. In case of rejection of his representation the petitioner can avail the other remedies. The result of the petitioner in Part-I, LL.B. Has been retained and the petitioner if applies to the University for appearance in part-II his case shall be considered by the University. Due to" the above observations learned counsel for the petitioner does not press this writ petition for the time being, which is disposed of accordingly. However, the petitioner can file fresh writ petition after the decision of the Chancellor, if so advised.