Al Wakeelo
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Petitioner: MUHAMMAD RAMZAN VS Respondent: THE STATE
Court Name: Lahore High Court Judge(s): Khalil-ur-Rehman Ramday Title: MUHAMMAD RAMZAN vs THE STATE Case No.: Criminal Miscellaneous No,1874/B of 1997 Date of Judgment:1997-05-16 Reported As: 2000 MLD 94 Result: Bail application dismissed
Judgment ORDER ' It is not denied that Mst. Kaniz Fatima is a legally wedded wife of Ghulam Rasool complainant. At the time of lodging of the F.I.R. It had been thought that she had been abducted by Ramzan petitioner and others but during the course of investigation it transpired that she had developed illicit relations with Ramzan petitioner and had voluntarily eloped with him. Kaniz Fatima has since been arraigned as an accused person in the said case. 2. The learned counsel has not been able to offer any reasonable explanation as to why the petitioner should have been falsely implicated in the present case. The conduct of the petitioner is not such which could entitle him to the concession of bail. The learned counsel placed reliance on Mst. Wazeeran etc. v. State (1987 M LD 1202) and Muhammad Saleem Ullah v. State (1993 PCr. U 1533). Dismissed;