Full Judgment Text & Judicial Ruling

Court Name: Sindh High Court Judge(s): Shabbir Ahmed Title:Dr. Malik MUHAMMAD ARSHAD KHAN vs Ch. MUHAMMAD ASHRAF and

another Case No.: Judicial Miscellaneous No,18 of 2001 Date of Judgment:2002-01-28 Reported As: 2002 CLC 906 Result: Order accordingly Judgment ORDER Nazir's reference is taken on record to the extent of compliance order, dated 29-11-2001. Nazir has also claimed 1% as his fee as per. Rule 128(v), Chapter 1, Appendix C. The Nazir cannot claim fee in respect of attachment only. If he was appointed as a Commissioner for sale of the property in the suit or execution, he is entitled for fee but on attachment no fee is permissible. Consequently, Nazir's fee in terms of rule 128(v), Chapter 1, Appendix C, is declined. This order will not be bar in the way of Nazir, if he was Commissioner for sale in Execution No,12 of 1994.

Related Legal Research & Directories

• Browse all judgments from Sindh High Court
• Browse Pakistani court decisions from the year 2002
• Search Pakistani statutes: Constitution of Pakistan 1973, PPC, CrPC, CPC & Family Laws
• Analyze this case with Al Wakeelo AI Legal Assistant