Al Wakeelo
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Petitioner: JAMIL AHMAD VS Respondent: THE STATE
Court Name: Sindh High Court Judge(s): Qaisar Ahmed Hamidi Title: JAMIL AHMAD vs THE STATE Case No.: Criminal Bail Application No,83 of 1993 Date of Judgment:1993-02-06 Reported As: 1993 MLD 1170 Result: Bail granted
Judgment ORDER ' This is an application for bail made on behalf of applicant Jamil Ahmad, who is detained in Crime No,279 of 1992, Taimuria P.S., under section 399/4.00, P.P.C. The bail application made on his behalf was rejected earlier by learned Sessions Judge (Central) Karachi, vide order 6-12-1992. 2. I have heard Mr. Sardar Muhammad Ishaque, learned counsel for applicant and Mr. M. Hayat Qureshi, learned counsel for State. The latter has opposed the bail application by stating that it is premature to grant bail to applicant at this stage. 3. The perusal of the F.I.R. makes it clear that offence against applicant, if any, will fall under section 402, P.P.C. and not under section 399 or 400, P.P.C. The case of Muhammad Ayub Memon v. The State reported in 1990 PCr.LJ 41, is a direct authority on this point. 4. Having regard to the above position, bail is granted to applicant in the sum of Rs,50,000 (Rupees fifty thousand) with P.R. bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court.