Al Wakeelo
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Petitioner: MUHAMMAD SIDDIQUE VS Respondent: THE ADDITIONAL SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER JUDGMENT
Court Name: Lahore High Court Judge(s): Abdul Shakurul Salam Title:MUHAMMAD SIDDIQUE vs THE ADDITIONAL SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER
JUDGMENT
Reported As: 1987 CLC 2397 Result: Application dismissed Judgment JUDGMENT JUDGMENT 2. The contention of the learned counsel for the applicant is that the writ petitioners have obtained an order with respect to the land of the applicant Feroze Din for purchase under Act XIV of 1975, whereas the applicant has not sold the land. The applicant's entire allotment was cancelled on 14- 9-1976. He has never raised a figure or demurred in all these 11 years. The petition has been allowed on the plea of the writ petitioners that they were the vendees from the allottee with an observation that if they were in possession and entitled under the latest law viz. Act XIV of 1975, they may apply to the A Chief Settlement Commissioner for sale in accordance with law. No interference is called for in the earlier order passed two years ago, on an application filed nearly two years later. For the foregoing reasons, this application is dismissed.