Al Wakeelo
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Petitioner: NAZIR AHMAD VS Respondent: MEMBER (ADMN.), CENTRAL BOARD OF REVENUE, ISLAMABAD
1992 P L C (C
1992 P L C (C.S.) 450
[Federal Service Tribunal]
Present: Syed Ally Madad Shah, Chairman, Rana Rifat Saeed and Misbah Ullah Khan, Members
NAZIR AHMAD and 3 others
versus
MEMBER (ADMN), CENTRAL BOARD OF REVENUE, ISLAMABAD and 2 others
Appeals Nos. 369(R), 373(R), 375(R) and 376(R) of 1990, decided on 5th December, 1991.
Civil service---
----Back benefits---Entitlement to---Civil servants who were dismissed from service on certain charges, were exonerated of the charges and were reinstated---Civil servants though were reinstated, but were denied back benefits treating intervening period as leave extraordinary---Civil servants admittedly, were not honourably acquitted/exonerated of the charges against' them, but were given benefit of insufficiency of evidence---Civil servants, were rightly held not entitled to back benefits.
Pakistan v. Mrs. A.V. Issaccs PLD 1970 SC 415; 1984 PLC (C.S.) 62; PLD 1961 Lah. 644 and Sardar Ali Bhatti v. Pakistan through General Manager, NWR, Lahore PLD 1961 (W.P.) Lah. 664 ref.
Shah Abdur Rashid for Appellant (in Appeal No. 369(R)/90).
Appellant No. 2 in person (in Appeal No. 373(R) of 1990).
Appellant No. 3 in person (in Appeal No. 375(R) of 1990).
Ch. Fazal Hussain for Appellant (in Appeal No. 376(R)/90).
Hafiz SA. Rehman Standing Counsel for Respondents.
Date of hearing. 3rd December, 1991.