Al Wakeelo
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Petitioner: SALEEM AHMAD KHAN AND Other VS Respondent: PUNJAB ROAD
Court Name: Labour Appellate Tribunal Judge(s): Sardar Muhammad Abdul Ghafoor Khan Lodhi Title: SALEEM AHMAD KHAN AND Other vs PUNJAB ROAD Case No.: Petition No. FD-235 of 1981 Date of Judgment:1983-02-28 Reported As: 1983 PLC 864 Result: Appeal dismissed
JUDGMENT
JUDGMENT This review petition has been made by Basharat Ahmad Khan for the interpretation of the order dated 28-3-1981 to be effective against Saleem Ahmad Khan and Mohammad Anwar and not against him. 2. Contempt petition was made by the petitioner jointly with Saleem Ahmad Khan Lodhi, Muhammad Anwar and Aftab Ali Hashmi. Before my learned predecessor it was agreed that if the petitioner was willing to forego back benefits, he will be given his due seniority. Name of the complainant is not given in the order who accepted the offer. However, the contempt petition was disposed of as having borne fruit. 3. It has been argued that the petitioner did not make any statement, so he not being party to the undertaking is not bound and thus the order being patently incorrect may be withdrawn against the petitioner. I amt afraid there is no provision of review in the Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969 and all the provisions of C.P.C. Not being applicable, Order XLVII A is not available to empower me to withdraw the order passed by my learned predecessor on 28-3-1981. The review petition, therefore, is filed.