Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Citation: 1971 PCRLJ 1075
Court: Lahore High Court
Year: 1970
Decision Date: 1970-11-05
Parties: SADIQ MASIH vs GHULAM MOHAYUDDIN AND ANOTHER
Case cited as 1971 PCRLJ 1075
Court Name: Lahore High Court Judge(s): Muhammad Afzal Zullah Title: SADIQ MASIH vs GHULAM MOHAYUDDIN AND ANOTHER Case No.: Criminal Revision No. 736 of 1970 Date of Judgment:1970-11-05 Reported As: 1971 P Cr. L J 1075 Result: Petition dismissed Judgment ORDER Sadiq Masih; Ziledar, Section Harpoke, Sheikhupura Division, has by this revision petition called in question the order of a learned Magistrate whereby Ghulam Mohay-ud-Din and Sana Ullah respondents have been charged for offences under sections 332/ 109 and 332, P. P. C. The petitioner who is the complainant in the case claims that he suffered a grievous hurt, therefore, the charge should have been under section 333, P. P. C., In this revision petition, grievance was, also made with regard to the failure of the Magistrate to charge the respondents under sections 364 and 466, P. P. C. But the learned counsel for the petitioner has not pressed that part of the petition. 2. - In support of the contention that the petitioner suffered a grievous hurt in so far as the injury to his eye is concerned, the learned counsel for the petitioner has read certain portions of the medical evidence. It is true that, according to the doctor, injury, was found as he put, it "technically grievous" but on careful examination it has begin founds be only a, simple hurt. Admittedly, no Eye Specialist or Expert has been produced by the prosecution, as a witness though it appears that at one stage an opinion of such an expert was obtained. Even…
Read the full judgment on Al Wakeelo — Pakistan's AI-powered legal research platform.