Al Wakeelo
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Petitioner: SHAM BADSHAH VS Respondent: HAFIZ TEXTILE MILLS LTD., KARACHI
Court Name: Labour Appellate Tribunal Judge(s): Ghulam Rasool K. Sheikh Title: SHAM BADSHAH vs HAFIZ TEXTILE MILLS LTD., KARACHI Case No.: Appeal No, KAR-258 of 1977 Date of Judgment:1977-09-13 Reported As: 1978 PLC 248 Result: Appeal dismissed
Judgment DECISION ' This is an appeal against the order of the Labour Court dismissing the application made by the appellant under section 25-A, I. R. 0. On the ground of limitation. 2. The appellant was in the permanent employment of the respondent. His service was terminated on 29th August, 1975. He sent a grievance notice on 2nd September, 1975. Again he sent another grievance notice on 13th November, 1975. Thereafter, he filed an application under section 25-A, I. R. 0. In the Labour Court on 7th January, 1976. 3. A preliminary objection was taken that the application was hopelessly time-barred and no application for condonation of delay was made. This ground found favour with the learned Presiding Officer and he dismissed the application. 4. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and I entirely agree with the learned Presiding Officer that the application made undo section 25-A, I. R. 0. Was hopelessly time-barred and the delay remained unexplained. In fact, there was no application for the condonation of the delay. The application was, therefore, rightly dismissed, 5. In result the appeal is dismissed.
---
## Page 2
revisions by the competent authorities. Therefore, it is advisable to consult the official sources or legal professionals for the most up-to-date and accurate information.