Al Wakeelo
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Petitioner: MUHAMMA HUSSAIN VS Respondent: THE STATE
Court Name: Lahore High Court Judge(s): Muhammad Zafarullah Title: MUHAMMA HUSSAIN vs THE STATE Case No.: Criminal Miscellaneous No. 1 of 1981 in Appeal No. 390 of 198 Date of Judgment:1982-09-20 Reported As: 1983 P Cr. L J 1822 Result: Bail granted
Judgment ORDER It is contended by the learned counsel that prosecution evidence with regard to the motive and the place of occurrence has nest been believed. As regards the case .For the complainant that they had the turn of the water the learned counsel states that documentary evidence bad been produced to the contrary. Out of the two eye-witnesses one has not been believed--. The other one Abdul Khaliq is a real son of the deceased and according to the learned counsel it is not safe to rely on his testimony. 2. The merits of the case cannot be gone into in depth at this stage, but it is a fit case, in view of the peculiar circumstances, for suspension of sentence. The sentence is, therefore, suspended. The petitioner be released if be furnishes a bond in the sum of Rs. 20,000 with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of A. C., Gujranwala.