Al Wakeelo logo

Al Wakeelo

Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty

Initializing Secure Chambers

2025 SHC 172

Mst. Mai Pathani vs SHO P.S Patni Sukkur & others

Petitioner: Mst. Mai Pathani VS Respondent: SHO P.S Patni Sukkur & others

Court: Sindh High Court Decision Date: 2025-02-21

Full Judgment Text & Judicial Ruling

Court Name: Sindh High Court Judge(s): Riazat Ali Sahar Title: Mst. Mai Pathani vs SHO P.S Patni Sukkur & others Case No.: Crl. Misc. Application No.S-88 of 2025 Date of Judgment:2025-02-21 Reported As: 2025 SHC 172 Result: Application Dismissed

Judgment

ORDER Statements filed by respondents No.1 to 3 are taken on record. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record. On perusal of impugned order dated 30.01.2025, it appears that learned Additional Sessions Judge-II, Sukkur has dismissed the application filed by applicant seeking permission to record her second statement under section 164 CrPC for the reasons that there is no exceptional circumstance to justify for doing so. From perusal of impugned order, it appears that learned Additional Sessions Judge has assigned valid and cogent reasons while passing the impugned order and no illegality or infirmity is found in the impugned order requiring interference of this Court. Accordingly, instant Crl. Misc. Application is dismissed

Related Legal Research & Directories