Al Wakeelo
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Petitioner: SADIQ MOHY UD DIN VS Respondent: SECRETARY, DISTRICT ALLOTMENT COMMITTEEAND Another
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pakistan Judge(s): Karam Elahi Chauhan, Abdul Qadir Sheikh Title:SADIQ MOHY UD DIN vs SECRETARY, DISTRICT ALLOTMENT COMMITTEEAND
Another Case No.: Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 577 of 1976 Date of Judgment:1981-11-25 Reported As: 1981 SCMR 817 Result: Petition dismissed Judgment ORDER KARAM ELAHBB CHAUHAN, J.-This is a petition against an order of a Division Bench of the High Court dated 27th April, 1976, whereby an Inter Court Appeal filed by the petitioner was held as incompetent under the law relevant in this respect. The High Court in support of its view relied upon Malik Ahmad Khan v. Iqbal 1975 SCMR 275. When confronted with the above precedent the learned counsel conceded that the order of the Division Bench was correct and that be does not challenge the same as such. 2. However, he submitted that this should be treated as a petition for leave to appeal against the order of the learned Single Judge (which was challenged in 1. C. A.) dated 13th February, 1976 whereby his Writ Petition No. 773/75 was dismissed. It may be mentioned that in this respect the petition would be barred by 51 days. Learned counsel has prayed that the delay may be condoned because the petitioner had pursued the remedy of the Inter Court Appeal in good faith and the time spent therein should be allowed towards counting the limitation in the present petition. 3. We are afraid that the request cannot be acceded to in the face of the judgment of this Court in Malik Ahmad Khan v. Iqbal which already existed in the field much prior to the institution of the Inter --Court Appeal and which with little diligence could have been noticed by all concerned, for the proposition that no Inter-Court Appeal in this case could be filed. In these circumstances, the question of filing the Inter-Court Appeal in good faith does not arise and as such there exists so sufficient cause for condonation of delay. 4, The result is that this petition has no merit and is dismissed.