Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Official Citation: 2025 SHC 619
Court / Jurisdiction: Sindh High Court
Petitioner: Const. P. 1460/2025 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi - Muhammad Rafiq Mallah (Petitioner)
Ruling Summary: This decision was rendered by the Sindh High Court, officially reported as 2025 SHC 619. In this matter between Const. P. 1460/2025 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi - Muhammad Rafiq Mallah (Petitioner) and the Respondent, the court adjudicated key questions of statutory construction, procedural regularity, and legal precedent under Pakistani law.
Core Holding: The honorable bench evaluated governing statutory provisions and judicial authorities to establish the rights of the parties, delivering the binding reasoning set out below.
COURT: Sindh High Court CASE NO: Const. P. 1460/2025 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi CITATION: 2026 SHC KHI 619 PARTIES: Muhammad Rafiq Mallah (Petitioner) ORDER DATE: 16-MAR-26 BENCH: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi A.F.R: Yes ------------------------------------------------------------ ORDER SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH AT KARACHI C.P No.S-1460 of 2025 ______________________________________________________________ Date Order With Signature Of Judge ______________________________________________________________ Hearing of case.
1. For orders on office objection Nos. 1 to 4 a/w reply as at A. 2. For hearing of main case.
16.03.2026
Mr. Qadir Hussain Khan, advocate for the petitioner along with petitioner. Mr. Ali Asadullah Bullo, advocate for respondents No.8 and 9. Mr. Ali Safdar Depar, AAG along with DSP Raza Mian, Legal -II, CPO, Karachi, SHO/SI Safdar Solangi, Inspector Imam Bux, Police station Thatta and Inspector Nazar Jokhio RRF Karachi. -------------
Petitioner Muhammad Rafiq Mallah filed this Constituti on Petition under Article 199 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973, seeking directions to the official respondents to produce record of pending cases/FIRs, restrain them from arresting the petitioner or registering any FIR without permission of this Court, take action against respondents No.8 & 9, stop alleged harassment, and provide protection to the petitioner in accordance with law.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that respondent No.8 had lodged six FIRs against the petitioner and his relatives at Police Station Mirpur Bathoro, out of which the petitioner has already been acquitted in five cases, while FIR No.236/2025 is pending before the learned trial Court.
Learned counsel for respondents No.8 & 9 submitted that they have neither harassed the petitioner nor intend to do so in future and that any civil or criminal litigation shall be dealt with by the competent Court of law.
In view of the statements made by the parties present in Court that they will not cause harassment to each other and that their civil/criminal disputes shall be resolved before the competent Courts of law.
This petition along with pending applicati on(s) is disposed of in the above terms. JUDGE Shahzad Soomro