Al Wakeelo
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Petitioner: Malik IFTIKHAR AHMAD VS Respondent: THE PROVINCE OF THE PUNJAB through Secretary JUDGMENT
Court Name: Lahore High Court Judge(s): Raja Afrasiab Khan Title:Malik IFTIKHAR AHMAD vs THE PROVINCE OF THE PUNJAB through Secretary
JUDGMENT
Reported As: 1989 P Cr. L J 697 Result: Petitions disposed of Judgment JUDGMENT ' In the Writ Petitions Nos. 10051 and 10867 of 1980, the learned counsel for the parties have resolved the controversy by making statements in Court. The learned counsel for the petitioner states that he will not press the petitions if a specific direction is given to the Investigating Officer for completion of the investigation. The learned Additional Advocate-General has agreed with the suggestion of the learned counsel for the petitioner. The Investigating Officer is present with record of the case. In view of the statements of the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Advocate-General, a direction is issued to the Investigating Officer to conclude the investigation of the case within 15 days, without fail. If after recording evidence the Investigating Officer comes to the conclusion that no case is made out against the petitioner, he shall prepare a cancellation report under section 173, Cr.P.C. And thereafter shall proceed in the matter according to law. He shall also submit a compliance report to this Court. With this observation, both the writ petitions are disposed of.