Al Wakeelo logo

Al Wakeelo

Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty

Initializing Secure Chambers

2009 YLR 1290

MUHAMMAD MUSHTAQ vs BAHAUDDIN ZAKARIYA UNIVERSITY, MULTAN

Petitioner: MUHAMMAD MUSHTAQ VS Respondent: BAHAUDDIN ZAKARIYA UNIVERSITY, MULTAN through V.C. and 3 others

Court: Lahore High Court Decision Date: 2009-02-18

Full Judgment Text & Judicial Ruling

Court Name: Lahore High Court Judge(s): Saif-ur-Rehman Title:MUHAMMAD MUSHTAQ vs BAHAUDDIN ZAKARIYA UNIVERSITY, MULTAN

through V.C. and 3 others Case No.: Writ Petition No,5670 of 2008 Date of Judgment:2009-02-18 Reported As: 2009 YLR 1290 Result: Petition dismissed Judgment ORDER SAIF-UR-REHMAN, J.---The petitioner contends that he got admission is A M.Sc. Zoology in Government Degree College, Dera Ghazi Khan affiliated with Baha-ud-din Zakariya University, Multan. He appeared in the examination of the University, however, failed because respondent No,4 did not award five marks in the practical examination on account of internal assessment under influence of respondent No,3 with ulterior motive. He seeks direction to respondent No,1 (BZU) to review the result and award internal marks; or in the alternative a chance may be given to him to reappear in the practical examination only in paper-1. 2. The allegations were denied in the comments. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner contended that act of the internal examination was based on mala fide. The career of the petitioner shall be ruined, hence, the asked for relief may be granted to him. 4. From the comments furnished by the Principal, Government Degree College, Dera Ghazi Khan, it appears that the petitioner himself had not taken the studies seriously. He failed several times in one paper or the other and could not acquire the knowledge to qualify his examination. When confronted, the petitioner acknowledged that he had been failing previously as well. 5. Under Rules of the University, he has availed of all the chances and failed to refer to any law as to how the examiner be compelled to review his previous assessment and award further marks to the petitioner. 6. This petition is held to be without any force, hence, is dismissed.

Related Legal Research & Directories