Al Wakeelo logo

Al Wakeelo

Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty

Initializing Secure Chambers

Const. P. 6483/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi - Shah Jehan (Petitioner) — 2024 SHC 49

Official Citation: 2024 SHC 49

Court / Jurisdiction: Sindh High Court

Petitioner: Const. P. 6483/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi - Shah Jehan (Petitioner)

Legal Principle & Question Decided

Ruling Summary: This decision was rendered by the Sindh High Court, officially reported as 2024 SHC 49. In this matter between Const. P. 6483/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi - Shah Jehan (Petitioner) and the Respondent, the court adjudicated key questions of statutory construction, procedural regularity, and legal precedent under Pakistani law.

Core Holding: The honorable bench evaluated governing statutory provisions and judicial authorities to establish the rights of the parties, delivering the binding reasoning set out below.

Full Judgment Text & Judicial Ruling

COURT: Sindh High Court CASE NO: Const. P. 6483/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi CITATION: 2026 SHC KHI 49 PARTIES: Shah Jehan (Petitioner) ORDER DATE: 14-JAN-26 BENCH: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho A.F.R: Yes ------------------------------------------------------------ ORDER SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH, KARACHI C.P. No.D-6483 of 2024 _______________________________________________________ Date Order with signature of Judge _______________________________________________________

For hearing of CMA No.8244/2025

14.01.2026

None present.

------------------------- The main grievance of the petitioner is illegal construction which is going on at one side of 200 feet road in between Saeedulah Goth and Sector 19 -A, Baldia Town, Karachi. Petitioner has moved a complaint to the Deputy Director Land, Baldia Kemari Town, District Kemari, Karachi, however, he has not received any reply. Accordingly, the Deputy Director Land Encroachment, Kemari was directed by this Court vide order dated 09.01.2025 to decide the application or complaint of the petitioner available at page 103 within three months, however, no compliance has been made and today the petitioner’s counsel is also absent. Since the decision has already been made, therefore, no further action is required at this stage. The contempt application/151 CPC application is dismissed for non-prosecution.

JUDGE

JUDGE Aadil Arab

Related Legal Research & Directories